[tmtranscripts] NET #50, Oct. 22, 2018

[Roxanne Andrews]

PR

*New Era Transition #50 – God’s Will; Days of Light and Life; Motivation –
Oct. 22, 2018*



*Machiventa Melchizedek, Planetary Manager*



Topics:

Reframing God’s Will

Can we come back to Urantia to continue this work?

A remote possibility that the Life Carriers might come back

How Urantia will come into the Days of Light and Life

You are making your contribution to Urantia now

Coarse and blasphemous language that is current in our culture

Bringing back a civil society

Under what conditions could Life Carriers return?

Use of CRISPR and gene splicing

Homo spiritus

Clarification on communism and socialism terminology

Mass migrations of uninvited immigrants

Prevailing emotional behavior in our society is fear

Thoughtful contributions by citizens are needed

Lack of interest in design teams

Reaching out to civic organizations

How do we motivate people who are satisfied with what they have?

The egotism of the dysfunctional political ruling parties

Reaching out to PTA groups

The greater responsibilities of Planetary Management

Benediction



TR:  Daniel Raphael, PhD



Team members present:  Roxanne Andrews, Craig Carmichael, Liz Cratty, Jeff
Cutler and Stéphane Labonteé.



Invocation:  Liz



*October 22, 2018*



*Reframing God’s Will*



*MACHIVENTA:*  Good morning, this is Machiventa Melchizedek.  I am glad to
be here with you and glad to get started once again.  You have always seen
that spirit is here to help you and that you see us in some ways as an
extension of your own doing God’s Will or your will, and sometimes you are
confused about that, but in this case we want to reframe that for you, to
know that you who *will* to do God’s Will, who *will* to do Christ
Michael’s Will in the Correcting Time, you have co-creatively become an
extension of Christ Michael’s Will for your planet.  And through your
participation, through your listening, through the urgings that we give you
and your motivation to move on those urgings, you are doing Christ
Michael’s Will.



Now for all of us, including myself, all the angels, midwayers and
celestial teachers and others, this is about as close as we can come to
living a mortal life.  We are so pleased to have you working with us, to
express Christ Michael’s Will in the living flesh of your own lives, it is
almost tactile rather than vicarious in that we can become much more in an
experience of mortal living than we could ever come in any other regard.
For us who have been created rather than developmentally grown from cells
and having received a spark of life and the downloading of a Thought
Adjuster, this is a precious experience to us.



The clearer you are in your relationship with your Thought Adjuster and
releasing your will to God’s Will, and following the crumbs of urgings that
lead you to fulfill God’s Will, we get to experience that with you.  We are
incredibly delighted with the experience of knowing God through you, just
as Christ Michael and the First Source and Center as your Thought Adjuster
gets to enjoy their experience of living with you.  And so, in this regard,
as you become more and more in sync with God’s Will, you become more and
more one with the presence of God within you and with us, and we experience
the joy of experiencing the development of the Teaching Mission, Correcting
Time, Magisterial Mission and all the other work that is taking place.  It
is as though we are sitting in the audience at some distance from the
activities, but we have that ability to experience it to some degree.



I am open for questions.



*Can we come back to Urantia to continue this work?*



*Liz:*  Good morning, Machiventa; it’s nice to be back with you and the
group today.    My question today is that many of us have such affection
for this planet but we can see that it is in grave trouble.  I’m not sure
you are going to want to answer this, but when we pass over onto the other
side, is there an opportunity, or could there be an opportunity for us to
come back and assist with the recovery of this world, or will we lose our
enthusiasm for that with more interesting things to come?  Could you to
address that, if you would, please.



*A remote possibility that the Life Carriers might come back*



*MACHIVENTA:*  Certainly, and thank you for your question.  This is a
situation that we in our various teams under Christ Michael have given much
attention; it is a rather long arc from the time that the Life Carriers
brought the plasm to Urantia to be developed, for it to evolve, for it to
grow.  The reason for all of that was first of all to bring sentient beings
who could receive a Thought Adjuster, to bring those into existence.
Second is to provide a physical and social environment that would assist
individuals to grow into the fullness of the relationship between
themselves and their Thought Adjuster, with God.  Those have been
accomplished, as you would logically assume or gather.  It is not that we
do not care about the planet, for we care about it greatly, for it will
continue to be the environment that your children and hundreds of
generations will enjoy and grow into adulthood, and to maintain a living to
make decisions about themselves that would contribute to their growth.  We
have also considered that there may be the possibility of the Life Carriers
returning in some fashion or some manner, to restart some diversity of the
fauna and flora on the planet.  This is a remote possibility.



You must realize as well that the longevity of Urantia depends upon it
entering into the Days of Light and Life.  Once it does that, then your sun
will continue on for many hundreds of billions of years—into the trillions
of years—of its existence and this planet would make a contribution to the
Universe and to God the Supreme, and all the generations of people who live
and breathe and are raised and make decisions about their lives on this
planet.  Now, if you didn’t catch that underlying piece of logic that I did
not state, then I will make it clear: that if your planet fails to reach
the Days of Light and Life—this is a presumption, of course, that this is a
possibility—that your planet would end in a supernova of your sun, which
may occur anyhow, but in that case, the planetary population would be
transported to another planet, which has been discussed in the *Urantia
Book*.  It is of paramount importance to Christ Michael that this world,
the planet of the Cross, becomes stabilized, physically and socially, but
most importantly socially and spiritually at this time and into the
centuries ahead.  One thousand years on your planet is not much time; but,
it is sufficient time, however, for nations to come into the development of
peace, of social, political and economic stability and eventually into
peace and then onward to the Days of Light and Life.



*How Urantia will come into the Days of Light and Life*



You, who have dedicated your lives to the *Urantia Book* and to the
Correcting Time, have initiated the very inception of the Days of Light and
Life.  There is within these efforts the kernel, the seed, the germ plasm
of that eventuality.  You do not know how this will come about, though we
know fully.  It is that we have hope.  Just as angels can feel
disappointment, and all of us can feel disappointment on occasion when your
projects fail—particularly those involving individual mortals—we also feel
hope and we also feel joy, for in hope there is always the possibility of
fulfillment and then joy and this is what we are working at for your
planet, for each of you individually and for your civilization.  You have
within this Correcting Time and the projects that we are working on, the
very germ plasm I have mentioned, to bring about the process of social
stability, which will then inaugurate political stability and economic
stability.  Professions and the social institutions will come along in like
fashion as they follow this trend of burgeoning stability.  Now that there
are no longer any Dark Channels or Circuits of Energy on Urantia, it is all
now of Light and it is beginning to glow with the infusion of the angelic
work that Nebadonia has begun.  It is delightful for us to see this new era
of your planet.









*You are making your contribution to Urantia now*



To answer your question more directly, no, you will not have another
opportunity to make a contribution to this world.  You have done so already
and you are doing so with your own lifestyle and the decisions that you
make and how you educate and enculturate these current generations of
children and young adults and older adults to care for their planet, even
better than they would care for their home.  I wish you to think about
this, to hold this close in your hearts as the statements I have provided
in the last few minutes are very important; they are critical to the
completion of Christ Michael’s plan.  And no, Christ Michael’s plan will
not be thwarted, but it will continue.  There will always be some
individuals who see hope and see the light at the end of the tunnel,
figuratively and in reality, to make an effort to assist your planet and
all the people come into light as you are doing now.



*Liz:*  Thank you very much.



*Coarse and blasphemous language that is current in our culture*



*Jeff:*  I have a question.  It certainly doesn’t have the gravitas of what
Liz did, but my personal observation is that in the last 50 years or so, at
least in the United States where I have been living, the human discourse
has become increasingly coarse and less towards light.  Addressing elders
in the formal has given way to addressing almost everyone in the familiar,
including our conversations here.  But it also seems that blasphemous
language seems to be incompatible with living a life dedicated to the 7
core values.  My point is to inquire about the commandment, at least
in the *King
James* *Version*, that says “Thou shalt not take the Lord’s name in vain.”
Would you be willing to comment upon the ancient or original meanings of
this, and the contemporary usage of the everyday and common use of
expletives in ordinary conversation today?



*MACHIVENTA:*  No, I would not.



*Bringing back a civil society*



*Jeff:*  Okay.  Then can I ask will the adoption of the 7 core values after
the collapse bring back a civil society?



*MACHIVENTA:*  I invite you to take a look at the ethics and morality that
we have co-creatively brought into existence for you.  We would ask you to
look at the last 5th step of the logic sequence of ethics and morality, at
“The Graces of Expressed Ethics.”



Ref.:  Page 52-56, *Restoring the Greatness of Democratic Nations — A
Radically Conservative and Liberal Approach.*
https://sites.google.com/view/danielraphael/free-downloads



Those are the decision-actions that make your lives smooth, social
interaction smooth and being kind.  There are many performances, actions
that you can take as a mortal to insure that there is a kindness that goes
on in conversation within your intrapersonal conversation and your
interpersonal conversation with others.  This sequence was not made to be
just an idle piece of thoughtfulness to be left and set aside.  What this
sequence provides from values-to-the-graces is meant to be employed in your
daily lives.  We ask you to read through those carefully and to see how the
graces could apply to our conversations here.



*Jeff:*  Thank you.



*Under what conditions could Life Carriers return?*



*Stéphane:*  Machiventa, we’ve mentioned evolution and I think that is to a
world population of sentient beings who can receive Thought Adjusters and
social environments of growth and to know God.  Under what circumstances
would the Life Carriers be allowed to return to restart diversity of fauna
and flora?



*MACHIVENTA:*  Yes, I would be glad to engage your question, though
briefly.  If you see this planet and perceive it as a Planetary Manager
outside of the orbit of the moon, you would see all that was existing in
all regards; that in other words you had a God’s point of few and
knowability, to know all that is going on in your world, and to perceive it
on a course that will lead to its eventual destruction—both of humanity and
the supports that are necessary for the material continuity of your species
and all other living species—if you took that situation now and you took it
one logarithmic scale forward, you would then be at the point where you
would be seeing the extinction of life on your planet.  And this could
occur easily within the next 1000 years.  That is not said in jest; that is
not set as the maximum or minimal estimation; it is just simply stated that
it is *possible* that that could occur.



Yet your world would have many hundreds of thousands of years—millions of
years, billions of years—remaining to provide for new species, and for the
rejuvenation of your world.  As you know, there are no plans put in place
for the removal of a population from a planet except in the case of a
supernova or some cataclysmic instance as that, or another planet smashing
into your planet and everyone lost on both planets.  This is very remote
and the Power Directors of the Local Universe are in charge of insuring
that that does not occur.  Near misses are not collisions, though so may be
near misses.  I hope you realize that what I am saying is all hypothetical
to answer your hypothetical questions.  In that case, if the destruction of
your world occurred—and let us say that there was a maximal nuclear whole
planet devastation of all living beings, both in the seas and upon land and
in the air, then there would be a reseeding of your world; there is plenty
of time to do that, even from the plasma regeneration of your planet in the
seas, and even after the decay of nuclear waste materials have decayed into
lead.  To answer your question succinctly, no we are not planning on doing
that.



*Use of CRISPR and gene splicing*



*Craig:*  I would do a little follow-up on that:  We were talking earlier
about the potential of recreating previously existing species through use
of CRISPR and gene splicing.  I thought that perhaps it might be the way
that we would work, sort of maybe along with the Life Carriers to recreate
diversity on the world?



*MACHIVENTA:*  Yes, that is one avenue.  We would look further to that
process to become more refined and more specific to the adaptation to the
human genome to generate more peaceful individuals.  This is completely
possible.  Your gene structure, your genome, is such that it has many
unactivated programs that could be activated in time and at will,
particularly by the Life Carriers and their mission to advance your species
to its next evolved level.  That is even now going on very slowly, but
deliberately through the recombination of individuals who generate
children.  When the CRISPR process comes into its 3rd generation of
specificity and capability, it will become far more capable of bringing out
the best elements of the human genome.  This is the adventure which we look
forward to.  It is not that Homo sapiens sapiens will be replaced; it is
that Homo sapiens sapiens will evolve and they will evolve in such a manner
that there will not be the mixed crossing as occurred as between Homo
sapiens and Neanderthals.  This possibility which I have just presented is
far more advantageous than to bring Pterodactyls back into existence, do
you not think?  (Laughter.)



*Liz:*  Although that might be fun!



*MACHIVENTA:*  Until they chased you and ate you!



*Homo spiritus*



*Jeff:*  Can you make any comments at this time about the situation of a
generation of young people that have been referred to in the past
[transcripts] as Homo spiritus?



*MACHIVENTA:*  I have just spoken about that.



*Jeff:*  Okay, so that is what you are referring to.  Thank you.



*MACHIVENTA:*  Are there any questions from our readers?



*Clarification on communism and socialism terminology*



*Roxie:*  Yes, I have two from Elena from Odessa, Ukraine.  Her question
refers to our NET #46 session when you talked about governance such as
communism and socialism will ultimately fail.  Her 1st question is:  “What
kind of communism and socialism are we talking about:  Are these
unsuccessful attempts to implement the principles of communist society into
practice or is it about theoretical communism?  I would like to receive
clarification.”



*MACHIVENTA:*  One moment.  We have great difficulty with human linguistics
and the tendency to place labels on things that are process oriented.
Communism and socialism are labels; I do not care what you call them, and
you may even call what we have promoted in a social development towards the
Days of Light and Life as socialism and communism as long as they contain
the 7 core values, the ethics, morality, the priorities of decision-making
to sustain people and the hierarchy of needs of individuals to change their
interpretation of the values that are consistent with the 7 primary
values.  It is important that this communism and socialism that you have
labeled also become adaptable, meaning adaptable to the changing
interpretations of needs of individuals and of whole groups of societies
and your whole world.  You could put a label of a rose on a dandelion and
it would be a nice dandelion you would think of in different terms.  And so
you could put a label of communism on democracy and socialism on democracy
and vice-versa as long as you use the requirements, the criteria that I
have mentioned to sustain your societies.  What has failed to happen in the
idealism of communism and socialism and of the utopian societies that were
striven to be established in the earlier generations in Europe, and so on,
is that they become an edifice of ego, a place where the personal
predispositions for controlling others, for having power and authority and
self-elevation and aggrandizement has removed the ideals down to the
mundane and even the immoral.  Labeling as that is difficult.



One thing was not clear in your question is “what was the starting point of
the ‘communism’ and ‘socialism?’”  If they are to become adaptable and to
sustain themselves into the far distant future, then they must support the
sustainability of their people.  The full expression of the innate
potential of each individual to become all that they can become and to
enjoy all of the opportunities that they possibly can to develop their
potential; when this occurs, we could care not what you call it.



*Roxie:*  She has a follow-up question but I think perhaps you have
partially answered that:  “Is it correct to talk about socialism and
communism as a completely negative experience for the future of mankind?  I
would be interested to know your comments.”



*MACHIVENTA:*  In the context of my closing statements in my last answer I
gave you, there would be no difference.



*Mass migrations of uninvited immigrants*



*Jeff:*  Machiventa, in our last session, you gave us some insightful
answers to questions about the mass migrations of uninvited immigrants and
what you described as appropriate response and inappropriate response, so
in the United States where I live, the millions of refuges from Africa and
the Middle East has been sort of an abstraction; it’s very real in Greece
and the buffer states between these countries in turmoil and Europe, and
the reason I am asking for a follow-up on this is we are now being faced in
the United States with a large procession of people who are clearly
economic immigrants with skills that we do not know very much about, who
are marching toward our border through Mexico.  I guess I want to have you
sharpen the pencil point on what you brought up last week that would
suggest that we are better serving the community of people in Honduras and
Guatemala by giving them assistance and aid to stay home where they were
born, but make a better life for them.  Am I interpreting that correctly?’



*MACHIVENTA:*  There is so much about your question which begs to be
answered, but you have not asked directly.  You are asking about policy
questions of a national entity as the United States.  A far greater
question involves the morality of the actions that this nation will take
with or against those people.  You have had benefit of the article and the
paper that we have produced co-creatively with This One, having to do with
uninvited immigrants.  The morality and ethics that were presented there
and the question involved are very real.  Two years ago they were very
remote from the United States, but now they are very personal and
immediate.  It was our hope that this paper, this brief article, would have
been shared with others who would become aware of the morality and ethics
that this nation will be confronted with, similarly as those in Europe.



The difference is that this nation now has been given the moral awareness
to deal and treat with those people in moral and ethical ways for
themselves and for this nation and their originating nations.  It is not
very complex; it is quite simple when it is dealt with in non-political,
non-religious, non-economic terms.  How do you preserve your culture?  How
do you preserve your nation?  How do you ensure the sustaining continuity
of your culture in all its regards, as the preservation of culture that
could be art, that could be literature, that could be your way of life,
your democracy and so on?  You have seen how the various immigrants from
the last century and a half have developed their own enclaves within this
nation, enjoying the benefits of democracy, yet preserving their own
culture.



There is a necessity in the adventure of national growth and stability and
sustainability that preserves the basic elements that give freedom to
individuals to appreciate.  When you have many millions of people who cross
the border, who can create problems and difficulties for the established
culture and population, which were unconceivable ten years ago — those
things must be considered.  We wish you to think about this and that your
question has led to a much more in-depth response than perhaps you have
anticipated.



*Jeff:*  Thank you for that eloquent response to my non-question.



*Prevailing emotional behavior in our society is fear*



*Stéphane:*  I wish to add that if everyone’s behavior were driven by the 7
core values, we would be living in a very different world, but talking
about behaviors it is driven by the framework we live in and the framework
is the “law of the land” of different countries, different cultures.  And
layered on top of that is our feelings, how we feel about things and the
inequalities in this world.  Can you elaborate, please on the prevailing
behaviors and what is driving them in our society?



*MACHIVENTA:*  Yes, and thank you for your question.  The prevailing
feeling or emotional response—you could also put it in the “sense” is of
fear.  There is a tremendous pervading fear around the world, whether it is
in such a prosperous nation as this, or other prosperous nations elsewhere
and the fear that is in nations which are not prosperous and have great
difficulty.  The difference in the feeling is that you have experienced the
wonder of democracy, what it provides, a wonderful economy and the ability
to express yourself and develop your potential, and to enjoy the benefits
of who you are and what you have become.  In nations that have only a
survival level of existence, lifestyle is dictated by necessity.  Feelings
of fear are ever pervasive, feelings that death is only a day away.  The
threat of such non-existence pervades their lives and drives them forward
to make a living as best they can.  To have fear is something that is
primal to them.  When they face a cobra in the grass in India, they are
very real there and they kill thousands of people every year.  Those who
are impoverished fear those things.  “You,” in generality used as a general
term, “you” as a society have much to fear because you have much to lose.
A feeling that is growing, that there is less and less input or control by
citizens individually in their democracies, and that their nation is going
in the direction that they can no longer influence, either as individuals
or even as groups.



I will now return to our old refrain of the Correcting Time, that it is one
of our immediate intentions to address this need.  There is more need for
an eloquent form of democracy than there is for a need for food in your
nation, and this applies to many other developed nations as well.  The
factor that maintains a democracy is participation by individual citizens
who can gather together to form large groups to influence their
government.  This is a necessary process that we will begin to influence
immediately in democratic nations.  It is not our desire to foment any
surges of passion in nations which are not democratic, to have
democracy—they will do that on their own and they know already the benefits
of a democracy and a democratic economy than their own.



What we wish to do is to have democracy to become socially sustainable so
that it makes a contribution to the long-term sustainability of a
democratic nation, and to the global civilization.  When we say, “long-term
sustainability of a democratic nation,” we are not talking about a decade
or a century; we are talking about 250 years, 500 years to 1,000 years of
democratic process.  In those years democratic nations must develop its
adaptability and evolve it to its more developed stages.  We have written
much about that through This One and we will revisit that now:  The first
stage of democracy is the feeling of need to participate, let’s say in a
monarchial nation that eventually underwrites a development of final
rebellion, revolt, and revolution and the expungement of the monarchial
rule.



Then when the new government, the democratic government is formed, as
occurred in this nation in 1789-1791, that is the beginning of stage two.
Stage two democracies will mature as has now occurred in this nation and
several other democratic nations.  They have reached and even surpassed the
maximum effectiveness of citizen participation and are now swaying in ebb
tide back towards the rule of “one,” and the rule of a few, an oligarchy.
This is anathema to the process and survivability of democracy.  Your
nation, for example is in a stage where it is now ebbing back toward its
old ways of authority, power, and control.







*Thoughtful contributions by citizens are needed*



It is necessary now for your democratic process to become adaptable, by
infusing the adaptability factor into your Constitution and Bill of Rights
to grow into the third phase, which means a return to more direct
participation by individual citizens. A direct democracy is laughable; it
is a phase of democracy that is unworkable.  There must come into existence
in an evolved democracy the *thoughtful* participation of citizens to make
contributions.  We have suggested that multiple individuals working as a
team can make thoughtful, intelligent, and ingenious suggestions for the
benefit of their communities, and for their states and nation.  Some will
establish “Co-Creative Design Teams” with a Melchizedek as their team
Consultant.  If the team is a secular team, we can easily work with that
format as well to bring alternatives to the thinking of team members.  When
you have at least 10 teams per county or per city throughout this
nation—let us say the whole nation—or in every school district (several
teams in every school district,) you would then have thoughtful
participation by thousands of citizens in teams that can then combine their
thoughtful contributions to a larger amalgamation of those thoughts for the
needs of their nation.  Only in this way will your democracy remain.  The
benefit of this development of democratic process is that the teams become
learning organizations; the teams become a means by which an individual
citizen can learn about the issues that they are dealing with, about the
research material and make decisions about it.  This then informs the
larger society of the democratic process with these *informed
opinions* and *contributions
by teams*.  The process is slow, but it is sure and it is effective, and
this is where we are going with your democracy, given the opportunity to do
so.



*Lack of interest in design teams*



*Craig:*  You’ve answered a question I didn’t ask which is how you get from
a local design team level to the state and national levels and that’s
wonderful.  At this time I don’t see enough people interested to form such
local design teams, but I imagine that must be coming?



*MACHIVENTA:*  Yes, you are correct.  You cannot go to state and national
regional levels until you have teams.  That is what we are now in the
process of developing, though they are not visible to you.  I chuckle
because we have much in the works around you, but you do not see it and are
not aware of it.  This design team process is an idea that one day will
become viral in every democracy.  It is of necessity because of the
incompetency of your legislative process and the supposed leaders who have
swayed enough population to elect them.  This is most unfortunate.
The *Urantia
Book* speaks a great deal about the mongrelization of your populations and
your societies; this is very real!  This is what is going on now in your
nation; it is not from invaders, it is not from slave population, but it is
from your own citizens who do not seek to do any better than what they have
already, other than to buy newer vehicles and so on.







*Reaching out to civic organizations*



*Liz:*  So would you recommend that we reach out to local civic
organizations like Rotary and speak about the 7 core values and the design
team process in hope to light a fire?



*MACHIVENTA:*  Yes, we would; we would highly recommend that.  It is a
matter now of informing the public about the resources that you have.  The
design team process is a proven and effective means by which you can have
informed citizen participation in the democratic process.  This is
something that must become a project, so to speak, much as there is
“Crutches for Africa” and other projects that these service organizations
have.  Once this becomes a feasible process, and an acceptable project, and
not seen as a political enterprise, then there must be training and *then*
you will see this begin to bloom and blossom as the teachers become
facilitators and the facilitators start teams and they multiply.  Does this
answer your question?



*Liz:*  It does; thank you very much.  I’ll get on that.



*How do we motivate people who are satisfied with what they have?*



*Stéphane:*  My question was on a more basic level in a society where
people are satisfied with all of the food and all of the things that make
us satisfied in this world, how do you motivate people to move, to realize
that their life is unsustainable and to move into the 3rd stage of
democracy?  How do you motivate people to realize this?



*MACHIVENTA:*  Thank you for your question.  “Necessity is the mother of
invention.”  So far, invention has taken the form of material goods in your
nation.  When the toys are taken away, then what is left?  Then there is
only interaction that is left.  You will see the answer to your question in
the arc of this discussion I am going to give you now:  You see how this
nation’s current President was elected?  You will see in time when things
go awry in your society, when the economy begins to collapse, that there
will be riots and revolts and even rebellions, but we do not see a
revolution occurring.  There will be huge swaths of segments of your nation
that will be in turmoil.  You will see a great deal of material violence go
on in your nation that will go on for quite some time.  It too, eventually
will wane and cease.  You will not have an altogether dystopian world; it
will not give way to any utopianism in any regard.  What will occur is that
there will be a great loss of people and material supports for the
lifestyles that they had.  If people can no longer afford 80 inch
televisions or even 32 inch televisions, or cannot afford the monthly fee
for the cable or satellite connection, then people will be disgruntled and
act out their violence.



It will eventually be seen that violence is non-productive; it just creates
more chaos and mayhem and disorganization in a high degree.  It is at that
time and before then that the positive influences of social evolution
occur; and I would use the term “regeneration,” as well, that people must
be taught how to adapt to the circumstances, and that would include these
design teams, the values and teaching morality and ethics to individuals.
Motivation, again, occurs through need; where there is no need there is
happiness, satisfaction, ease of lifestyles and so on.  What will occur in
this large arc of many years will be the reinvention of democracy; it will
be widespread and clearly known that developed and mature stage 2
democracies no longer are functional or effective.  It is necessary then
that a new form be developed wherein lifestyles can be resumed and renewed,
though in more modest terms.



We are here early with you; we have started over 35 years ago with this
effort and here we are with these ideas and thoughts now at the point where
these ideas and these proposals for social sustainability are in fact in
need of being implemented to continue the growth and adaptability of
democracy as it has evolved.  What will tip the scale towards the greater
need for these social devices or these social innovations is the need for
reorganizing your governments on a more functional and effective scale.
They are now at perhaps one of the most dysfunctional as has existed during
the duration of this nation’s democracy.  It has always been our effort to
bring about these plans in a way as they mature so that they can now be
applied to people who are concerned and want to have a greater voice.  The
means is here; the processes have been matured; now it is a matter of
having people become aware of them and to then begin to implement them.  It
is our heartfelt desire and need for your societies to accept these new
innovative processes now, in the early stages, so that they can be proven
to larger swaths of your population in the years to come.  Thank you for
your question.



*The egotism of the dysfunctional political ruling parties*



*Stéphane:*  Machiventa, the problem is that the most dysfunctional
political group is leading at a time when this idea is at its lowest
prosperous time, so they point to prosperity as an outcome of their
success.  (Machiventa chuckling.)



*MACHIVENTA:*  Yes, they would do that, would they not?  The egotism of
political ruling parties has no bounds; they attribute all good things to
themselves while negating and dismissing and ignoring the opposite that is
almost as frequent as the prosperity.



*Reaching out to PTA groups*



*Jeff:*  Liz brought up the possibility of going to Rotary groups, which
are cheerleaders for local populations and local businesses and local
institutions.  Would it also be appropriate for us to approach Parent
Teacher Associations who are parents who are involved very emotionally with
the education of their children?  Is that also an appropriate place to
pursue?



*MACHIVENTA:*  Yes, it is an excellent place to start, as there is a desire
and need of parents to be involved.  Yet, the development of a secular
design team must be done outside of a PTA school meeting situation.  It
would be through participants, someone going to several of those meetings
to become acquainted and offering to individuals the possibility of
establishing a team that would approach a problem.  The difficulty often
occurs is that the team would want to work on a larger problem than they
are capable of finding the answers.  Once they form, they would then need
to engage a problem that they can solve and to demonstrate their
effectiveness and their intelligence to come up with reasonable answers.
It could be something quite as simple as the placement of a water fountain;
it could be the placement or colors in a school, and so on.  It is
necessary to begin simply before taking on larger problems and eventually
the power structure and the monopoly in education by its hide-bound unions
and professionals who have a strangle hold on public education and other
educational situations.



*The greater responsibilities of Planetary Management*



In closing, I’d like to recap many of our sessions in this closing and with
a brief benediction.  You have begun to think and perceive your lives as
individuals, yet as Planetary Managers.  You are beginning to get a far
broader grasp of the arc of responsibilities of planetary management than
you have ever had before.  Also in that vision, in that frame, see that you
cannot focus on just one problem because on a world, on a planet, all
problems are interrelated—everything is connected.  The social is connected
to the physical, the physical is connected to the environment, the economy
is connected to both; your political realm is connected to all of it, so
your existence as families, as nations, as social entities is a part of
this whole.  And it is not possible to put your arms around all of these
problems and solve them alone.  They must be solved in groups, in systems
of teams.  Your political system is connected to your economic system; your
economic system is connected to your social systems; your existence as a
nation is integrated, it is not separated.  There is the necessity of
thinking in moral and ethical terms, in personal problems, in interpersonal
problems, in social problems, and so on.



What Christ Michael has devised with us is a program that you know as the
Correcting Time that embraces the entire major elements that are necessary
to initiate a far broader program of correction on your world.  This is a
process in itself; it is a system.  We will be engaging your democratic
nations particularly, because they have more integrated systems in a way
that brings about their evolution, their social, political and economic
evolutions.  This comes about through the necessity to adapt to changing
circumstances, to changing conditions.  Behind that, it is necessary to
understand the human motivation that causes social change.  When we say
“social,” we mean social in all aspects which embraces all social
institutions, social political and economic and many others, so that
through adaptability to changing circumstances and conditions, we can be of
influence to individuals who make decisions to assist that evolution to
take place in a rational process that brings about social stability and
eventually social sustainability.  It is a process by which we engage the
holism of a nation and its societies through its most influential social
institutions.  We have addressed the family; we have addressed education;
and we have engaged the political aspect, plus references to others.  It is
important that we begin to influence the family first; it and education
live side by side.  They seem to have come into a distinct separation in
several decades, and it is now time for them to evolve and to see their
connectedness and their mutual responsibilities.  The social institution of
family and the social institution of education are the most influential of
the society to adapt and evolve and survive.





*Benediction*



Having said that, I bless you for your participation; I sincerely bless
each one of you who reads this text; you are being touched through this
text.  The energy of this document which you have before you, whether it is
on paper or it is in some other medium has energy in it and that is the
presence of the reality of the spiritual influence this world has received
from Christ Michael and Nebadonia directly.  You are our emissaries in many
ways; you are our testing field for seeing how these programs are
acceptable or not to other people.  Yes, it will be a great challenge for
people to separate spiritual evolution from religious evolution, but it is
necessary in spirituality to see the oneness of all beings; you are one
with your planet, you are one with the plants, you are one with others and
all existence.  Just as there is a biosphere, there is a spiritual-sphere
of energy that surrounds you and each one.  This energy pervades your lives
when you allow it to enter, and particularly so you will feel the guidance
when you will to do God’s Will, and you can do no better than that in the
eternal lifetime that you have before you.  Good day.

# #
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://circuit1.teamcircuits.com/pipermail/tmtranscripts/attachments/20181028/cc7bbde9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2018-10-22, NET #50, Machiventa.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 76288 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://circuit1.teamcircuits.com/pipermail/tmtranscripts/attachments/20181028/cc7bbde9/attachment-0001.doc>