<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16735" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Monjoronson.com Q/A Session #24</DIV>
<DIV>Teacher: Monjoronson</DIV>
<DIV>T/R: Mark Rogers</DIV>
<DIV>Moderator: Mary Rogers</DIV>
<DIV>October 14, 2008</DIV>
<DIV><U>
<P>Questions Answered This Session:</P></U></DIV>
<DIV>1 - Do Teaching Mission Groups Get Evaluated by the Teachers to Make
Improvements?</DIV>
<DIV>2 - Will the Teaching Mission Become Blended with Non-Teaching Mission
Groups Someday?</DIV>
<DIV>3 - Is The Spirit of Truth the Spirit of Michael?</DIV>
<DIV>4 - How Can We Effectively Communicate with Something We Have No Direct
Perception Of? </DIV>
<DIV>
<P>Prayer: Divine Parents, we're back once again to invite you to join us as we
come together in the pursuit of service under the banner of the Monjoronson.com
Q/A session of the week. We know you always provide your loving, nurturing
assistance as we attempt to position ourselves properly to be conduits for the
grace that we know you would bring to the equation. Thank you for this grace
that brings us that which we seek in this process. Thank you for the love that
we feel as we turn to you and seek your guidance in this process. May all that
we do be pleasing in your sight as we arrive with our sincerity and our
intention to be of service in this hour, in this way. We ask you to help us
welcome Monjoronson to this forum that has been created for this purpose. We are
sure that you hear our petitions and would join us in this process. We seek your
blessing as we move forward in this process together. We are sure that we
receive it from you, thank you.</P>
<P>Monjoronson: Greetings, I am Monjoronson here to accept your invitation and
to join with you to promote this portal that we enjoy together at this time. We
are ready to begin with the questions, thank you.</P><U>
<P>1 - Do Teaching Mission Groups Get Evaluated by the Teachers to Make
Improvements?</P></U>
<P>Q#1: [Mary] Hi Monjoronson, there are two questions here relating to the
Teaching Mission. Could you give us some idea about how the Teaching Mission
groups operate now in that when a session is over with a teacher for a given
week, is there some sort of evaluation process that the teaching corps makes at
the end of the session to determine what adjustments to the group as far as who
continues to participate in the content of future lessons? Is there some
evaluation that the teaching corps uses after a session occurs?</P>
<P>Monjoronson: Thank you for your question, there is in fact multiple layers of
assessments that go on as these lessons are presented and received by eager
students. We are in constant observation of how any given lesson or curriculum
is received and we are constantly modifying the lesson plans to accommodate the
interests of the students. In a sense we do our very best to follow you through
the process and go where your interest is and pursue what you desire to
pursue.</P>
<P>This is the most effective approach we have found and where this is not
available as an option to us we will deliver a lesson designed to instigate this
interest and thought wherein we may follow you where that may lead. Certainly
there are basic lessons and concepts which are promoted such as stillness and
the ever present desire to find the divine guide within but this is a highly
interactive process wherein we have our greatest results when we speak to the
question and interests of the students.</P>
<P>That same truth is evident in this format we use in this moment. We do not
start out offering lessons to generate thought, but rather we solicit patterns
of interest where we may expand on awareness that is already in flux. It is
always true that there is a critical matter of timing that students must be
ready for the lesson or else it may be wasted, although nothing of spiritual
significance is ever truly wasted, it may simply lie dormant for some time until
the interest of the individual is aroused and then it may be utilized.</P>
<P>And so the answer to your question is most definitely there in a constant
effort to observe and evaluate the effectiveness of any of these communications
and we have noticed as perhaps you have that we are most successful when we are
speaking to your own interests. Thank you for this question.</P><U>
<P>2 - Will the Teaching Mission Become Blended with Non-Teaching Mission Groups
Someday?</P></U>
<P>Q#2: [Mary] Also, related to the Teaching Mission, is there a reason to
expect that the Teaching Mission might be blended in the future with other non
Teaching Mission groups who also have celestial contact and perhaps doing so in
the hope of bringing people to at least using the same language to describe
universe cosmology and the names of the types of personalities revealed?</P>
<P>Monjoronson: Thank you for the question. You may in fact have every reason to
suspect that the many aspects and facets, some of which you refer to the
Teaching Mission, will all interplay with each other as this entire program
moves forward. You mentioned the Teaching Mission as your area of consideration
but as you are well aware, we will stop at nothing to work within other
frameworks and contexts to reach all those who would seek and all those who
might be willing to find.</P>
<P>And so it is that there will be this blending of all the different aspects
out there eventually being unified under the common awareness that any possible
difference that may be experienced is but a fragment of the whole and therefore
a piece of the bigger puzzle. Truth abounds in all areas and this blending
together is a means to accept that truth is pervasive throughout. But when you
refer to using a single language to promote a single awareness and
understanding, this betrays the very act of blending together all the diverse
ingredients for it is not so much desired that there be a common language of
understanding as that there be within every language, an understanding.</P>
<P>There may be no direct translation between languages but there can be a
common awareness among languages that may be shared. This allows for the
diversity and the differences and the distinctions while still unifying with
principles and values and truths. So I would encourage this idea of blending and
add in the generous component of diverse languages and word symbols all
attempting to describe the same truths and principles for it is not necessary
that all humans on this planet use one language but it is desired that they have
one understanding.</P>
<P>So however this may be accomplished, coalescing will be promoted and it is
true that ultimately, blending is the goal and tolerance of diversity is a key
factor in this intermingling process. I hope this addresses your question
satisfactorily, thank you.</P><U>
<P>3 - Is The Spirit of Truth the Spirit of Michael?</P></U>
<P>Q#3: On another topic this questioner asks: Is the Spirit of Truth the Spirit
of Michael? If so, how can Michael be in spirit amongst us because he is
independent of time but not of space? Is it by means of the Holy Spirit, local
universe Mother Spirit, that Michael is in the midst of all who join in his
name?</P>
<P>Monjoronson: Thank you for this question. It speaks to some of the most basic
questions that humans have. Let us lay out some of the basics in as plain a
language as can be had in this process. You are identified by means of your
individual personality which is a gift from the First Source and Center and this
identifies you as a unique individual in all of time and space with your own
combination of personality traits. You then have along with you access to the
First Source and Center which is provided through that aspect of yourself you
would identify as the Thought Adjuster or your indwelling guide.</P>
<P>This is the avenue of approach you use to approach the First Source and
Center. Also you have another gift freely bestowed by your Creator, the Son, and
this gift of your Michael Son, the Spirit of Truth is as well a method of
approach to Michael and his personality. You too have a third divine presence
and that is of the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of the Spirit. This has as part of
it's constitution your mind circuitry as well as your material being.</P>
<P>This combination of gifts which constitute your being are all now temporarily
housed in this vehicle, in the material time and space realm. When you attempt
to identify these different aspects of you, you may seek distinct and separate
personalities to identify but this would be in error because none of these gifts
which have been given to you carry with them their own personality, rather they
are more like influences. </P>
<P>There is but one personality resident within you, your individual
personality, but there are means given to you by virtue of the gifts which
provide you avenues of approach, one to the First Source and Center, one to your
Creator Father and one to your sustaining Mother Spirit. So if you are seeking
distinct different personalities to look for, you will not find them because the
personality that they will identify with is yours and therefore they are hard of
individual distinction.</P>
<P>When you ask about the Holy Spirit, it is most familiar to you as your mind
circuit and your nurturing environment and existence. When you consider the
Spirit of Truth, it is most evident in your approach to knowing Michael and when
you speak of attempting to identify your Thought Adjuster, it is your attempting
to identify that fragment of the First Source and Center. All of this is done
around this nucleus of life that was granted to you in the form of your
individual personality.</P>
<P>And so it is that when you are most experiencing your interface with the
Spirit of Truth, you are coming closest to your awareness of Michael and will
register his personality and in this way it is possible to feel Michael's
presence as you access this avenue of approach. Michael's presence knows no
restriction of time or space and his omnipresent nature allows for him to
respond to all those who will utilize this avenue of approach.</P>
<P>It is this that he uses to bring his influence and gain access to you as you
so invite him through your opening of this avenue of approach. I hope this has
been helpful in defining some of the components that were blended into this
question for you are a complex being and it will take some time for you to even
settle on all the components of self and their relationship to each other, but
the fact that you are asking such questions is proof positive that you are
engaged with these gifts which have been provided to you and it is a joy to see,
thank you.</P><U>
<P>4 - How Can We Effectively Communicate with Something We Have No Direct
Perception Of? </P></U>
<P>Q#4: [Mary] Monjoronson, here is a statement describing the problem this
person is experiencing and then a question. I cannot identify in my perception
such beings and things as for example: Michael, Nebadonia, Thought Adjuster, the
First Source and Center or any other celestial whatsoever. As far as I can
perceive they are nothing more than the concepts in my mind and those concepts
most likely are not even valid reflections of what those beings and things
actually are. </P>
<P>When I try to communicate, even in my best efforts I do not address a being,
I address my mental concept of that being and when I try to listen I have no
idea how to hear from a being behind a mental concept or where to listen in the
first place.</P>
<P>Question: How can a human effectively communicate with something he has no
direct perception of? Is there a way to gain that perception? What other insight
into this communication thing could you provide Monjoronson? Thank you.</P>
<P>Monjoronson: Thank you for your sincere question. To address it we must
discuss a couple of things. First, it is not and has never been the goal for you
to, through some exercise of your will, develop the ability to sense specific
personalities as a means of gaining some form of communication as you state. We
are really talking sometimes about two different things, communication and
communing.</P>
<P>Communication, what we are engaged in in this moment is a process distinct
and separate from communing and feeling in touch with different personalities or
even different aspects of the individual self. If you are seeking communication
there are specific avenues of approach one can use to develop these circuits and
open up these portals but they are not the intended goal of all of these
communications that we avail ourselves of. </P>
<P>Rather these communications are meant to bring you more than just the word
[forms] which transpire but rather to bring you as well the presence, the
vibration as you might call it, the sense of these presences and vibrations are
carried on the wave forms of the words. One of the difficulties of even
translating spiritual thought patterns into material thought patterns is that
they must somehow be funneled and translated from one means of communication
into another. </P>
<P>As you know it may be difficult to translate one human language into another
accurately and that many translations still do not properly capture the intent
and this is between human languages so you can imagine the gap that must be
bridged in this process of bringing spiritual thought patterns and concepts into
material thought frames that may be understood. The next obstacle we encounter
is the overwhelming desire to understand with the mind and embrace with the
mind, the totality of the experience and here we encounter another difference in
translation.</P>
<P>If you consider the difference between art and science you will begin to
consider the difference in perception that we encounter because this process of
becoming aware of these different aspects is not scientifically valid. There are
no measurements which may be made to obtain verifiable results, rather some of
what must be experienced must be felt as in the appreciation of art.</P>
<P>When an artist goes about to make a statement there are innumerable
approaches that may be used and he must settle on his best offering of how to
convey a feeling, an idea, a belief and after having fashioned his art, there
then is much interpretation engaged in about the meaning of such art. In fact,
no two individuals may come to the same agreement as to what the meaning is. But
this attempting to distinguish the different ways of perceiving illustrates the
distinction I would make between attempting to understand what it is you would
sense and simply allowing yourself to feel, even to be in tune with, what it is
you are sensing. </P>
<P>The one is an intellectual exercise which will look for details and facts to
support its awareness, the other is a giving in to the awareness and the sense
that it is so. When one looks at art on this world they know they are not
attempting to quantify it as being equal to or greater than anything else, it
simply stands alone to be experienced and so it is with your attempt to approach
the different aspects of yourself. They cannot be analyzed, or scrutinized or
qualified by any means of the mind but rather the mind must allow the space for
them to be sensed and felt and known.</P>
<P>As I stated in the previous question, if you are looking to identify the
Adjuster or the Spirit of Truth or the Holy Spirit by personality, it is non
existent within your realm and so you can more readily identify the influences
of these presences rather than label them as your mind would have you do with
distinct characteristics and traits that you would identify with personality.
</P>
<P>But in all cases of sincere seeking, I encourage you to try and try again. If
it is the sincere desire of your heart, then you will find that which you seek.
It may not be in the arena in which you expect it, the arena of mind and
categories and delineations, but it is destined to be part of your experience
for you to truly know of these different gifts that are yours as your ascension
career takes you into experiences. It is in these experiences where you may
utilize these various gifts and the approaches they provide for you and in so
doing become familiar enough with them to finally recognize the influence they
have and how you have routinely interfaced with this influence in your lives.
You simply have failed to identify this experience as such.</P>
<P>I hope this provides some insight and I honor your seeking to find the
answers to your questions. I hope I have been helpful in some regard in that
way, thank you.</P>
<P>Mary: Those are all the questions we have tonight Monjoronson. Thank you for
your help and your presence, your time, until we meet again.</P>
<P>END</P></DIV></BODY></HTML>