<div dir="ltr"><p class="gmail-MsoNoSpacing" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">PR</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b><span style="font-size:14pt;color:rgb(112,48,160)">New Era Transition #44 – Leadership;
Exclusive vs. Inclusive; Crimes Against Humanity – July 30, 2018</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Machiventa
Melchizedek, Planetary Manager</b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">Topics:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Leadership</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Social
media is having great moral and ethical problems</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Effecting
the 7<sup>th</sup> generation after this one</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Linking
communities, societies and families</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">The
future is now up to us to be co-creative</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Is
there an advantage for either large or small governmental units?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Religious
tolerance</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Exclusive
leaders versus inclusive leaders</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">This
model will be emulated by other organizations, corporations & governments</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Churches
with exclusive leaders</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Current
changes in our culture </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">The
Golden Rule</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">We must
now work together to survive</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">We need
to learn to live in a world of non-constant growth</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">A
question on having stock in various corporations</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Gene
manipulation and style of leadership</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Being
personally liable for corporate decisions</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Predators
and crimes against humanity</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Will
Urantia evolve to include death penalty for crimes against humanity?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Traditional
morality versus proactive morality based on the 7 values</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">The
definition of Life has several degrees</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Being
“fully human”</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">The
definition of “human”</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Is
removal of predators a good place to start?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">What do
we need to do before the decimation?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">A need
to expand teaching of ethics</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">TR:
Daniel Raphael, PhD</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">Team members present: Roxanne Andrews, Craig Carmichael, Liz
Cratty, Jeff Cutler, and Stéphane Labonteé.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">Invocation: <b> </b>Stéphane</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>July 30, 2018</b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> Good morning,
this is Machiventa Melchizedek. It is a
pleasure to be here with you again; there is much to share as we know that your
developments are proceeding. Some of you
have noticed that the amperage and the voltage have increased from Nebadonia
and that this is crossing the lines with many organizations. You will see this continuing for the
long-term as it is necessary to get as many people on board with our mission,
our orientation and the future that Christ Michael has envisioned for your
planet, for Urantia. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Leadership</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">This morning I would like to
present you with another topic, which is familiar to all of us and which we
have developed more and more with other people around the world, and that has
to do with leadership. You must discard
the old traditional vision, portrayals of leaders that you have had in the
past, those historical, those traditional, those archetypes of history that you
have seen throughout your education and throughout the world — the alabaster
and marble busts of great leaders such as Alexander the Great, and the Caesars
with their curly hair, and so on. Those
were the leaders of the times and the circumstances that were needed then,
which offered them the opportunity to lead their nations, however they could,
or however they didn’t. In this case,
there is a huge change of culture going on in your world, one that will
eventually be dominated by spiritual people, those individuals who have an
intention of their lives to work with Christ Michael, the Teaching Mission,
Magisterial Mission and most of all the Correcting Time, which will be expressed
in many more missions as time goes by.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">The leadership we are speaking
about is the leadership that we have spoken or written about numerous times in
the materials about the co-creative design team process, where there is an
initiator, that unique 1% of any population in any community or nation where
the individual sees that something needs to be done and comes forward and does
it. That may be a young woman who
initiates a sewing class for other young women in her neighborhood; it might be
a local soil conservationist who is interested in eliminating soil erosion; it
could be someone who wanted to help the community embrace the new immigrants
who are in their community and on their street; it may be someone who sees a
vision that the culture that is around them is going nowhere and definitely is
declining in its moral and ethical aptitudes and needs a boost along the lines
of improvement for good decision-making.
This is the leadership that we are talking about, the leadership in the
local communities. The leadership we are
speaking about is not that of a national leader; it is not that of a political,
economic or social leader, but really and simply the leadership of community
members who see that something needs to be done.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Social
media is having great moral and ethical problems</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">What is occurring, and you are
seeing this in many areas if you watch the news and you stay in contact with
your friends, is that people who think alike are coming together, that they are
finding each other one way or another, and the most useful source is through
the Internet. Where your social media
are now having great moral and ethical problems, nonetheless they provide a
source for connecting individuals who have the same interests and same ideas
and same values, the same perspective of the future. This kind of leadership thinks about the
future—not of their future, or even their children’s future—but their
grandchildren and those children’s great-great-grandchildren. So this leader is thinking in terms of 5 generations
from now. The American Indian Nations
have always thought in terms of 7 generations, that what you do today has an
effect for 7 generations, and surely it most certainly does. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Effecting
the 7<sup>th</sup> generation after this one</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">The work that we are doing now has
that purpose, that intention and that direction, that verve and that energy to affect
that 7<sup>th</sup> generation after this one.
In this society, a generation is 25 years, so we are speaking about a
society 175 years from now. This is the
level playing field that we are striving to achieve meaningful outcomes. You are now a part of the team; think of an
immense soccer pitch that is 4 times as long as one you have for your soccer
playing; this is the soccer field that we are playing on—we play for the
long-term. We are inviting and training
our team members for the long run, the long haul, the long game as some people
say. It is important to have this
perspective. Short-term goals no longer
serve well, in fact they actually create a detrimental decline in the
long-term, as they do not fit into the long-term, long game of shingling and
dovetailing of various programs that must fit together and support each other
for the long-term. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Linking
communities, societies and families</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">The emphasis is on the supporting
of what is to come that we want to empower the future with the connection
between programs that link together and make your communities and your
societies and your families strong. This
is what we are looking for; this is the leadership which will be dominant
throughout your culture within 2 generations; there will be huge changes in the
world within the next 25 years, and surely you know this as well as we do. Social change is occurring on such a wide
scale and so rapidly that it is no longer possible to remain effective as a
traditional leader, but requires one who thinks out of the box and thinks in
inclusive terms, not separation, but inclusion, and expecting the best attributes,
assets, and energy of everyone who comes together in this inclusion.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">The
future is now up to us to be co-creative</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">We are here to support you; we have
done so much to prepare the way that when there is a success that supports what
we are doing, you will see one success follow another after that initial
success. This is the way we lead you
into the future. You and we have a
co-creative relationship; we have prepared this soccer pitch of the future for
your generation to support those future generations. You now must of course sign up, put on your
uniform and start kicking the ball.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Is
there an advantage for either large or small governmental units?</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Jeff:</b> I have never been a
natural athlete (laughing), I don’t know if I could kick a ball if it hit my
foot. But along these lines, Machiventa,
we as a planet seem to be grappling with the roles of small states, most of
which that were based upon ethnicity and small genetic pools; and large states
that have a wide and expanding ethnic gene pool. With the technology available thus far in the
21<sup>st</sup> Century is there any real advantage of either very large or
small governmental units?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> One moment. It is not so much that the size of the units
affects the future, but the attitude of those behind those façades of large and
small political units. It is a degree of
separation; it is the idea of exclusiveness, of exclusion rather than
inclusion. It is a process of thinking
of their own uniqueness and individuality, and this is the main impediment to
the future of inclusion and to the coordinated political, social and economic
work that is ahead of you.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Religious
tolerance</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Jeff:</b> So is religious
tolerance achievable in small states?
I’m thinking of things like Kosovo or Israel, or small states that are
essentially religious in nature, and not inclusive. Are those going to end up being not viable
over the long period of time?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> You have two
questions here: one is that there is the same kind of thinking for the
governmental units; as you began your first series of questions is similar with
religions, they are almost identical. As
concerns the amelioration of the eventual individuality of individual religions
that will be one of the last bastions to be dissolved in the long-term future
of say a millennium. The ideas of God
given rights, God given power, God given ascendency in the political nature of
religious organizations will persist simply because it gives the individuals in
power more control and authority.
However, as this world moves from its traditional mode of separation and
male dominance, there will become more of a familial feminine ideology among
all religions that find the commonality of the Spiritual Father, Creator of the
Universe in Nebadon, of our Local Universe, as the family of one. They will find they have more in common than
apart. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">Finally, this will be the
separation of religions and those positions of authority and domination and
control in religious/political organizations when finally the Avonal Son
arrives and presents himself to your world.
This will have a tremendous impact.
As you see now from the scathing and withering criticism of male
dominated religious organizations, the influence of those organizations,
particularly those which are insincere and want to verbally, emotionally,
socially abuse their followers, these are beginning to dissolve. Even though there is a resurgence of
Conservative Christian Religions, these [??unclear??] into existence to replace
those other long-term mainline religions, which have overstepped and outgrown
their use.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Exclusive
leaders versus inclusive leaders</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Stéphane:</b> Machiventa, I have
a question about exclusive leaders versus inclusive leaders. In my corporation I see both types. I see the exclusive leaders try to surround
themselves with the best performers, the A team, and then let the B team kind
of sit in the background. And the
inclusive leaders try to involve everyone and get the best out of everyone
working on the project. It seems like
the exclusive leaders are doing this to build their empire; they have personal
goals for personal use and for personal excess, they surround themselves with
the best people. Can you comment on
including a fully diversified team for the benefit of success of a given
initiative?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> Yes, most
certainly. Thank you for your question. The exclusive leader wants the very best
performers to support him or her to help put themselves in the more superior
position of performance themselves.
Whereas the inclusive leader has a sense of participation, their sense
of individuation is far less than the exclusive leader. The inclusive leader realizes that everyone
comes with a mind and the background of the culture, the thinking, the
education and preparation and experience in the organization that cannot be
tapped unless those individuals become an empowered participant in the team
environment. You have seen,
perhaps—maybe not—that in the design team process, this process through its
roles taps into everyone’s excellence, their best ideas, the greatest
attributes of creation and imagination and are brought forward. Everyone is of equal authority. There is a facilitator, as you know, and
other roles and the most important roles are those of the inquiring members,
who have been skilled in the arts of listening.
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;line-height:105%;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">[Break in the
recording.] </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> Thank you for
your patience. The inclusive leader
provides the best evidence of the Christ-like/Jesus-like inclusion of the
Apostles and his broader audience. It is
not about religion; it is about attitude; it is about the leader being one with
all the others, rather than being exclusive or separate or better. It is not a matter of better or worse, good
or bad, but of what works. Exclusion
does not work; it has a termination date; it has an expiration date which will
eventually come around. With inclusion, the
process of succession is already in place so that when team members become more
and more skilled at playing various roles in the team. While participating, they learn the skills of
the other members and eventually will move up in the situation to take on the
roles of other positions. However, with
the exclusive leader, those processes of succession oftentimes end very
abruptly and traumatically and are inherently destructive. They are ego-driven rather than participation
driven; rather than being one of many, it is one alone by itself. The model that is portrayed by the exclusive
leader is one that leads to more and more exclusion and then more
infighting. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">It is important that the inclusive
leader be emphasized in practice and taught by the superior organizations as
the model by which to achieve the greatest good for the company and for
individuals. The returns are manifold in
the inclusive teams and by the inclusive leader. The inclusive leader then becomes the
facilitator, much as the design team process which we have described.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Stéphane:</b> This matches well
with my observations as well, in observing these different styles of leaders,
although it is beginning to be recognized by the corporation and the employees,
and now Human Resources are promoting the inclusive leaders, and they are
starting to recognize the detriment that the exclusive leader brings to the
value for the corporation as a whole.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">This
model will be emulated by other organizations, corporations and governments</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> Yes, your
experience with your organization is in fact a demonstration of the worthiness
and superiority of the inclusive leadership model. Our team is nodding acceptance of what you
have said as the best way to proceed.
The model that your corporation is using and will use in the future is
one that will be emulated by other organizations and corporations and even
governments. What you are seeing in this
process is in fact culture-change. You
are beginning to see the culture-change occur with your own organization; this
will have wide repercussions in the culture of Western Civilization,
particularly in democratic nations.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">If you project this into the
future, you will see how it supports an evolved democratic process, one that is
necessary for this nation and other democratic nations to evolve into. With an organization such as yours, the
profits are there, the evidence is immediate to some degree, and that this
superior participation of many employees in the solution making and problem resolution
is very evident soon. I will leave it at
that, though there is much more to say regarding the democratic process.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Stéphane:</b> What works is the
driver, so in a corporation everyone tries to make a profit so an exclusive
leader is trying to get a bigger piece of the pie. When we talk about the Teaching Mission and
the Correcting Time, people coming to the place are volunteering their service for
this cause. Do you see the risk of finding
exclusive leaders within the Correcting Time?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">[This is <b>Daniel:</b> I missed the verb in
that last sentence.]</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Stéphane:</b> The risk of finding
exclusive leaders within the Correcting Time.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Churches
with exclusive leaders</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> We have seen
this occur in religions and individual churches where the church benefits from
an exclusive leader, but eventually to its detriment of the very organization
that they have saved. In business there
is the corporate savior, the individual who comes in and cleans house, puts
things in order and then is given a golden parachute and sent on their
way. This does not occur in religious or
spiritual organizations very often. What
occurs is the individual who is the exclusive leader comes forward and proceeds
as a deliverer of solutions but then fails to relinquish the authority and
control to the team. Team training
begins almost immediately. If you have
an exclusive leader, they must step forward to use their power, authority, and
control to immediately begin developing teams so that they become
successful. <span style="color:rgb(192,0,0)"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">You see the example in the
mega-churches around the world. They
have a strong leader, and then they have many associate ministers and group
leaders to provide the services to individuals who have an affinity for those
activities. For corporations, and
particularly for the Correcting Time, the inclusive leader is truly a
facilitator, leaving very little room for individuals to come forward as
exclusive leaders. Even though it may
seem as an exception that the lead facilitators tell the individual, “This is
an excellent idea! Go ahead and
independently develop this.” What is
inherent in that authority and that permission-giving is that they develop a
team to support that exclusive work and then bring it back to the larger group
later on.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Current
changes in our culture</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Stéphane</b>: We see many
examples of this change of culture appearing right now. An example is the #MeToo movement where
people that were oppressed for many years with this exclusiveness are now
speaking out against that. You could see
that in the #MeToo movement, you could foresee it in this Volkswagen scandal,
in the Wells Fargo scandals, people are now speaking out and that is an outcome
of inclusiveness. Is that correct? <span style="color:rgb(192,0,0)"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> That is correct.
What you are seeing is the swing of the
pendulum now moving towards the conservative moral and ethical process of
leadership. Our work with the morality
and ethics that we have developed with the 7 core values is a means to then
still that oscillation. What we wish for
a society is not to move from ultra-liberal, unethical and immoral to the
ultra-conservative moral and ethical, but rather to still the pendulum to the
middle where everyone understands the morality and acts accordingly. These movements that you see with #MeToo and
others is a process of culture change.
What has failed to come forward, but is now present in existence are the
unchangeable timeless, irrevocable and irreducible values and morality of the 7
values that your species was given in its creation. This is the firm ground for all moral and
ethical actions and leadership.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Jeff:</b> You told us that these
7 core values are part of our DNA; is it part of the human DNA to want to
follow rules?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> Quite the
contrary!</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">The
Golden Rule</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Jeff:</b> So, if that is the
case, then the Golden Rule is found worldwide in one form or another, but it in
of itself is not part of our DNA. Is
that correct?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> That is
correct. I’m waiting for your next
question.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Jeff:</b> (Laughing.) About your next question, if I can capture my
breath, Sir, if in our teaching process, should we not include the Golden Rule,
or is it worthy on its own to be part of this discussion?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">We
must now work together to survive</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> Let me give you
some foundational information and education first. The 7 values, particularly the first 4
values: <u>Life</u>, <u>equality</u>, <u>growth</u>,
and <u>quality of life</u> help you survive.
These four values help individuals survive, grow, and develop their
talents, and helps your species survive.
The 3 secondary value emotions of <u>empathy</u>, <u>compassion</u> and <u>a
generalized love of humanity</u> give your species its capability and the <i>possibility</i> of becoming civilized,
social beings living in moral and ethical families, communities, and societies. Detrimental individuality, that we spoke
about earlier, comes from the first 4 values; these cause separation from
others. The 3 secondary emotions motivate
you to integration and inclusion and provide the possibility of social
existence. What most of your society is
now experiencing, in the United States and the world, is a transition from
survival to social existence. It is our
hope, our teaching of these 7 values that your governmental, social agencies,
foundations and all organizations begin to understand this division and the
necessity of using inclusion and particularly the 3 secondary values to
maintain your families, your communities, your societies. You can no longer live out in the bush by
yourself and off the land with your spear, bow and arrow and stones. You must now live with each other to work
with each other and produce together a future and existence that supports many
other people. You live in a social
existence and it cannot be separated any longer. The penchant for individuality and unique
personal dominance to the full that most males exhibit is no longer useful to
the maintenance of your society and the interaction for the survival of your
nations. Once you understand this two
part aspect of the values and the movement of individuated exclusiveness to
inclusion and participation, then you begin to understand the answers to your
question.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">We
need to learn to live in a world of non-constant growth</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Stéphane:</b> Machiventa, I
would go a step in-between from survival to social sustainability that the
current generation has seen, for instance the 1960’s, is the cost in growth,
the constant increase in opportunities at every level, and that is through the
mark of time since the Second World War, that this is truly unsustainable. So what we need to change from this
generation moving forward, having forgotten the basic idea of survival is that
we need to learn to live in a world of non-constant growth in every aspect of
society. Is that correct?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> You are very
correct in that. The attitude and
perspective we are striving to convey to individuals who will be involved in
time is to become an active participant and co-manager in planetary
management. The motivation to bring
stability to your world must cross the moral hurtle of population
management. We do not use the word
“population control,” but “population management,” where individuals understand
that the individual has a powerful effect on the whole, as much as the whole
has on the individual. It simply takes
more time for individuals to reproduce to the capacity of 7-10 billion people
on a planet with limited resources. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">The problem that exists now is that
the solutions that we have cannot come to bear and cannot come into force until
the population has been balanced with the resources of the planet. Perhaps, you understand now why we have come
here with the Correcting Time at this time — it is because of the eventual
decimation of the human species. There
will be a depopulation of the species to a vast extent. It is our hope that at that time the
principles of planetary management are in place and appreciated by governments,
nations and all organizations, whether they are corporations or non-profits and
foundations. The difficulty now is the
“have nots” are moving from opportunity to want to have everything that those
other individuals have already achieved in their lifetimes and in their
lives. This is one stone grinding on
another, and these stones are not going to polish each other, but eventually
will destroy the grinding machine itself.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Liz:</b> Good morning,
Machiventa. I’m sorry that I was not on
the call last week, and I read the transcript very carefully with great
interest about gene splicing and the power that your scientists are having and
the moral dilemmas that come with that.
I had a question—I don’t know if you are willing to answer this—but it
has to do with the autism spectrum and whether or not that is the stuttering
beginnings of an evolutionary leap in our species?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> We have spoken
about this once before and I will not cover that again.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Liz:</b> Thank you; I’ll have to
look that up.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">A
question on having stock in various corporations</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Roxie:</b> Machiventa, in my IRA
portfolio, my broker has me invested in several different corporations. I HATE dealing with money, so I let my broker
make all the decisions as to what corporations he invests my IRA into so that I
can live off the dividends. Am I being a
moral coward for not being more involved by avoiding corporations which are
unethical? I have neither the interest
nor the time to research each one.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> You present two
situations: One is that no, you are not
a moral coward. We appreciate you and
know you make moral decisions and you are a highly ethical individual, and that
you provide service and caring for many people.
As for your investments, you should perhaps ask the question and find
out what general areas your investor manager is investing in, and particularly
the credibility and the fiduciary capabilities of your manager. Do you understand?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Roxie:</b> Not quite; not your
last comment.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> Is he honest?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Roxie:</b> As far as I can tell,
however he has a very strong leaning in the opposite political direction than I
have.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> Money does not
choose favorites; it chooses that which produces.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Roxie:</b> I see. He seems to choose the ones that produce,
yes. Thank you.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Gene
manipulation and style of leadership</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Stéphane:</b> Getting back to
our lesson topic for today, would you say the inclusive style of leadership is
that of a safety net in making bad decisions such as the genetic modification
of grains and corn. Had this been
supervised by an inclusive leader he would have gotten everyone’s point of view
from this and might have acted differently from generating these products. Is that correct?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> That is
correct. The genesis of the moral,
ethical inclusive leader is that they have become aware of many points of
view. The organization that started the
gene manipulation knew long decades ago of the detrimental effects of the
genetic modifications that they had made.
The question that the accountants and the long-term projectionists/actuaries
must take into account is “can we make more profit off of this than we will
lose in the end by being sued in a group action suit?” And, the answer that they came up with was
that they would make more money than the suit would take away from them. You are seeing the effects of unethical
decisions that have a moral impact that effectively relies on those who use
those products; the secondary effects as well.
Now that the morality and ethics that are based on the 7 values is
known, there will be no escape from that in the future as this morality and
ethics becomes inclusive to corporate structure and decision-making, they will
become more and more personally liable for the decisions that they make. Anyone involved in making that decision could
be sued collectively, and as they say “severally” to the very great detriment
of their own personal wealth, and the corporation would have to make recompense
for the damages to the users of the products.
Did this answer your question?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Stéphane:</b> Yes, it did. Is it similar to the tobacco industry class
action law suits, although that is a bit different as people have a choice to
smoke, whereas everybody has to eat, and currently there is no choice as to
whether or not we can eat genetically modified foods or not, since there is
such an infiltration of these products in our society and diets.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> That is correct.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Being
personally liable for corporate decisions</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Craig:</b> I’m intrigued by the
concept of the people being personally liable for their decisions within the
corporation, because that is something that I’ve seen as being very missing in
today’s society that when someone in a corporation has made some egregious
decision or other, nothing happens to them, the corporation pays the fine and
they don’t go to jail or anything happens to them personally; they just seem to
have no liability for making such detrimental decisions. This is just a comment.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> It is definitely
in the interests of the Correcting time that individuals, whether they are
corporate executives or not, become aware of their personal liability for the
decisions that they make. There is a great
history as to how this occurred, but we do not need to discuss that now. You are very correct in your analysis and in
how we hope to change this.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Predators
and crimes against humanity</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Jeff:</b> To take that one step
further, you commented several times that predators, particularly sexual
predators, essentially are committing—you haven’t used the phrase “crimes
against humanity”—but that’s the way I interpreted your words. Is it possible that one of the solutions in
our Correcting Time is to label sexually predatory behavior as a crime against
humanity, and would that behavior of individuals who were involved knowingly
bringing a product to market that would harm millions or billions of people,
would fall also into that category?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> That is a broad
leap, but it is possible to make that association. An example would be if the companies that
made foam insulation that was injected into the walls of homes, knew that the
formaldehyde in the compound was lethal to the occupants, then yes, that would constitute
a crime against humanity. I would leave
it at that.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Will
Urantia evolve to include death penalty for crimes against humanity?</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Stéphane:</b> I recall a
connection in one of the Papers of the Urantia Book where it talks about a
government on a neighboring planet where if such an action is discovered from
governmental officials, the death penalty is incurred. Do you see the same treatment evolving on
Urantia?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> Yes, most
definitely.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Jeff:</b> My comment is a leap,
because we have many countries that will not impose a death sentence, but they
have at the moment no means of removing predators or predatory behavior from
their society, yet crimes against humanity I thought were established in the
Trials of Nuremburg and would the decisions at Nuremburg actually embrace the
death penalty for perpetrators of many of the most horrible atrocities of today? <span style="color:rgb(192,0,0)"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Traditional
morality versus proactive morality based on the 7 values</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> The association
breaks down when you consider that the difference between traditional morality
and the proactive morality based on these 7 values. The emphasis on traditional morality is
historic in nature. Its orientation and
assumed intention is to eliminate the individuals who created the problem. This would not change with the new morality,
but the intention would change immensely.
The intention is to remove predators from society permanently, so they
do not reproduce and do not infect future generations with their predatory
behaviors. There would be a tremendous
detrimental impact upon those potential predators because they would know in
the first instance that if they violated a child or another adult, or whomever,
on the first instance that they would be placed in a situation of either being
removed or being treated in a way that they would not be a danger to society
ever again. We are speaking about a proactive
morality that has a conscience, a conscience for the welfare of future
generations. The traditional morality
does not have any such intention. It was
concerned about “correcting” the faults of the predators, and this may mean
that the individuals may have been guarded at a concentration camp, as in
Germany,….</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 0.5in;line-height:105%;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">[This is <b>Daniel:</b>
Lost it.]</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Machiventa:</b> The issue of
removing an individual from a society on a permanent basis which removes the
lifeforce from them has come under the title of many things—to assassinate people
by the authority of society, the death penalty, and so on. The intentions of all those processes are
historic and ineffectual. The process of
amending and removing individuals who predate on your society is an important
step in the maturation and evolution of an evolving society, one that has the
capacity to become self-sustaining. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">Maintaining the lives of those
predators in a society works against the social sustainability of a
society. A society that maintains such a
position will never mature to the point of ever entering into the Days of Light
and Life. There is a morality for
society and a morality for individuals.
Individuals are prohibited from harming or taking the life of another
individual unless it is morally necessary that they do so. Societies on the other hand have the moral
obligation of protection and maintaining that society for hundreds of
years. It cannot do that by letting
predators to remain in that society, and provide for the safety of future
generations of your children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren with the
safety and security that they need to thrive in the future. If you cannot go to the grocery store or
shopping mall for fear of being raped, murdered or beaten and having your car
stolen, and so on, then you live in a very desperate society that is in
desperate need of correction and modification of its own morality.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">The
definition of Life has several degrees</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Liz:</b> Thank you, Machiventa;
I appreciate what you just said, and yet the very first of the 7 core values is
that of Life. If we are talking about
capital punishment, it seems like even that very first value has degrees and
different definitions. Life is the first
value and yet there are exceptions to that rule.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Craig:</b> If you go just straight with that value of Life, generally
when you get rid of a social predator, you are actually saving lives, so the
value of Life is increased because the social predator goes on to harm life
after life if they are not stopped, so if you stop them, it does the least
amount of Life removal.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Liz:</b> I understand that, Craig,
and I agree with you 100%, but when we are trying to promote the 7 core values
as a way of decision-making, people are going to look at that and they are
going to talk about abortion, they’re going to talk about capital punishment,
and they are going to talk about vegetarianism and these are things we must
have answers to, or we must know where we stand. I don’t know if I want clarification, or if I
am just confused, or if you are going to suggest that I just work this out for
myself.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Craig:</b> I’ll keep quiet.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Being
“fully human”</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Jeff:</b> Liz, I’ll just chime
in here because we are not hearing anything at the moment from Machiventa, and
I think that the reason that I kept harping on this concept of crimes against
humanity is that if we are talking about people, who for whatever reason,
either it’s deformed DNA or something else that leads them to act out in a
manner that is compulsively damaging to other human beings, the question is,
are they in fact, “fully human,” and if a society under these circumstances we
are going to remove you because you are a danger to humanity, then you are not
really quite human. Is that good enough
of a bright line to make the decision on capital punishment?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Liz:</b> Machiventa, where are
you?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> I have been
listening to your discussion. You have
not formed a question or made a statement.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Jeff:</b> Alright, I’ll pose
this question directly, Machiventa. Is
someone that has a genetic, or for whatever reason, a natural, personal,
predilection to rape or molest a child, or something that is some perversion of
the normal genetic makeup of the rest of us, are they in fact “not fully
human?”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> You are correct.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Jeff:</b> So, adding onto that,
if a jury of competent people convicts him…</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> One moment. This is not about juries.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Jeff:</b> If a person is convicted
of behavior that proves that they are not fully human, is it reasonable to the
7 core values to say it is not an immoral act to remove them from the gene
pool, or from the existence on this world to send them to the next?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> You are correct.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Jeff:</b> So, in the old
language of English, when someone was put to death, they were “dispatched” with
the idea that the Ancients of Days, or the judgment would come to them and it
wouldn’t be upon us as a human race to fully judge them; it would be up to the
workings of the universe to determine whether or not their souls moved on,
etc., but the word “dispatched” was used hundreds of years ago about
executions.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> You are correct.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">The
definition of “human”</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Stéphane:</b> What is the
definition of “human?” Is it purely
adherents to the 7 core values, or can you bring a definition to the table?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> Yes, most
certainly. It is the position and
expression of the 7 core values. A
person who is a serial killer obviously has violated all 7 values. That individual has violated the morality of
your species. The definition of
non-human is someone who is not necessarily incapable, but who has chosen (made
a decision) not to conform to and use the 7 values with respect to other
people. You are talking about a person
who is taking their own individuality and their separation from others to an
extreme. This being does not feel they
are a part of the human race and that they have the authority and independence
to predate on others in whatever way they deem suitable. When you take this definition into
consideration, then there are many crimes that your society has accepted as
normal, which are incredibly abnormal and which do not work toward the benefit
and the good of all people. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">Their removal from the gene pool of
humanity is necessary as a preventative for the destruction of other
personalities. If any of you in the team
or audience has ever witnessed or has known an individual who has been raped, a
child or an adult, or who has been in the presence of a murder or severe
physical abuse, you know as well as the rest of us that this individual is not
human, and the most damning aspect of that crime is the damage that occurs to
the victim can never be remediated. And
further, that it damages the family, siblings, friends and associates. The stain of such crimes is so pervasive that
the damage would include many hundreds of people beyond the individual victim.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">Is
removal of predators a good place to start?</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Jeff:</b> Machiventa, I’d like
to follow-up with a question, and that is, we talked earlier about the
technology of the 21<sup>st</sup> Century and what has been made available to
large governmental units and small governmental units, and you said it doesn’t
make any difference, it is a matter of inclusion. Is it possible going forward that what you
just expressed to us about the necessity and the benefit of physical removal of
predators could be established in a small political jurisdiction, either a
county or a state or a smaller government, and then by example of the harmony
that it would bring. Would it bring
population movement in where people would want to live in such a society, and
would it be an example for others? Is
that a good place to start with this concept?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> It must start with
a broader education of the public to get a consensus that the public wants to
move in this direction, that it would be beneficial to that generation and to
future generations. You have jumped into
the middle of a proposition without having formed the introduction of such a
concept and such an idea to the public.
We are doing this through this transmission today, with you and to our
audience, and to an audience who find many of these ideas very repugnant. The possibility of taking a life of another
individual seems to be so universally immoral to them that they cannot accept
this possibility as a good thing, but see it as a bad thing.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">However, if you have ever visited
an individual who has been in prison for 5, 10 or 40 years, you will see the
waste of a life. How much more, many
more lives are wasted because of that individual? So in the end, if you preserve the life of an
individual without the possibility of them exploring the 7 values to become a
whole, complete individual, you might be protecting their life, strictly as a
breathing organism, but you are denying them through incarceration the
possibility, the equality of growing into their potential and to do so and to
improve the quality of their life. You
see the morality of the 7 values works for that argument and against that
argument to maintain life. Simply
locking a person away to keep their life may be a nice moral cushion for you to
accept and make you feel good, but on the other hand it is a highly immoral
activity to pursue, as it denies that individual the possibility of
growing. There is the crux for your
moral questions about capital punishment versus maintaining<span style="color:rgb(192,0,0)"> </span>their lives.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Liz:</b> Thank you very much for
that answer!</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">What
do we need to do before the decimation?</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)"><span style="text-decoration-line:none"> </span></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>Stéphane:</b> In light of this,
where do we need to evolve before the decimation to guarantee the new society
will be built based on these principles after the decimation?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">I would think that we would need to
evolve to the point where the 7 core values are ingrained in some parts of our
legal system.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b>MACHIVENTA:</b> Let us quickly
answer this as This One has to move on in the day. The answer is to begin as a generational
development of culture-change by teaching children the 7 values. It begins through a conscious and intentional
process of the enculturation and socialization of children and parents so that
there become individuals who understand the values and the morality that it
conveys. This morality is proactive
because it proactively gives people much freedom, but there are many
obligations and many responsibilities. I
wish to now bring our session to a close.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><u><span style="color:rgb(112,48,160)">A
need to expand teaching of ethics</span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">We are very heartened by the
questions you ask; we wish to have our audience respond to this course of
inquiry. Nonetheless we will pursue the
idea and teachings of ethics as it is so vastly different than your traditional
morality and ethics that it will need continual examination. You have seen today the examination of
maintaining life in the face of so many things, to maintaining the life of an
incarcerated individual is also a highly immoral activity by a society. This is one of the obligations and
responsibilities of a moral society and moral individuals. In all this discussion, know that Christ
Michael loves you, we love you, we care for you, and we want you to be safe in
this world and in the next world, and know that all is well for you in your
life. We embrace you with the light of
Christ Michael and the First Source and Center and know that even now,
Nebadonia surrounds you with her angels individually—dozens of them
individually with you now, keeping you safe from harm and danger and giving you
the greatest possibility to grow. Good
day. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"># #</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%;margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><br></p></div>